new // old // about // extras // layout // notes // email // diaryland | |
Censorship in this country has officially sunk to a new low. And why did they censor all her scenes? Because her son is gay, and in this episode she meets her son's boyfriend's mother. I read the episode guide to confirm my suspicion, and when I read that there was an actual storyline for Bree, it became obvious that I was right. WHAT THE FUCK, CHANNEL 5. Tell me what's the point of airing an episode when one storyline is completely truncated? Is it because of the "wedding gift" part? How utterly ridiculous. How the hell can they just cut out ONE ENTIRE STORYLINE? It wasn't even like last week's, when they clearly censored the gay porn DVD cover; it's ONE WHOLE STORYLINE. Is it just me, or is this uber-censorship, which I've never experienced before (but then, I hardly watch anything on Channel 5 besides DH, Lost, Harper's Island and American Idol), completely ridiculous that it just boggles the mind and defies all logic and good sense? I honestly can't even begin to put into words how stupid I find it. I'm not even a huge Desperate Housewives fan, but it just seems idiotic to me to cut out one whole storyline about one of the main characters just because it has some/a lot/I don't know 'cause I didn't get to watch it homosexuality content. Fuck this crap. Seriously. It's precisely what this country does: We want these imports from the West, but we're not ready to embrace all of it. We want their TV series, we want their investments, we want their MNCs; but when push comes to shove, we begin to pick and choose, as if we can really weed out the so-called "undesirable" elements. Just take a simple episode of a TV show: It's a one-hour show and I only got to see forty-five minutes of it. Did all of it make sense? Yes, the stuff that I got to see all made sense. But what about the next episode? Bree's son isn't going to stop being gay; are they going to cut out ALL her storylines? What's the point of even bringing in this show? If not, how the hell am I supposed to follow the rest of her storyline if I missed such a huge chunk? This is censorship at its most crass, most base, most incoherent. I fucking hate it. I'm so glad I don't watch Brothers and Sisters on our stupid English channel; if I find out about all the hot Kevin/Scotty make-out scenes way after the fact, I'd cut a bitch. I've always crusaded against censorship and I've always been irritated when cable stations/Channel 5 edit out swear words and "unsavoury" content; but their treatment of today's Desperate Housewives episode has officially sunk to a new low. And the funniest part? This is DESPITE a freaking "mature themes" parental advisory warning. SERIOUSLY? And even funnier? Last week when I saw the PG theme I was wondering if it wasn't because of the pretty dark storyline involving Edie Britt's husband and how he lied about starting the fire at the pub, and in the process of covering his own ass, fingered another guy as the culprit and thereby screwing up that guy's life. I thought it was rated PG because, I don't know, kids shouldn't learn from such bad behaviour, but when Andrew (Bree's son) showed up with his boyfriend at Bree's house for dinner, I finally saw the light. How damn sad for this country that homosexual content is deemed "bad" enough to warrant a PG rating, but not content that is actually, and universaly, morally abhorrent. Blaming someone else for your own crimes is clearly wrong, nd "bad" if we want to use that word, and I'm sorry, but I just don't see how THAT wouldn't warrant a PG rating, but homosexuality does. I'M SO IRRITATED. Our double standards are shocking sometimes, even though I should be used to it by now. When you really think hard about it, it's disgusting to deem a person's sexual orientation as capable of possessing a moral value when things like murder and lying and cheating get free passes over and over in the media without so much as a PG rating. I'm not even saying those things should be censored; I'm 100% against censorship. All I'm saying is that it makes no sense, at least to me, that shows with obvious morally-abhorrent content escape the censors, but not shows that merely feature some gay dude, or some gay storyline. SERIOUSLY. What the hell is the big deal? And if you really want my honest opinion, the sooner we teach everyone that gays are human beings, the better. This whole discrimination shit is utterly ridiculous. * ETA: I just read that the Bree storyline involved her and her son's boyfriend's mother competing for the couple's affections. Is Channel 5 worried that once parents with gay kids see the episode, they'd start accepting their gay children? Because, you know, it's so damn terrible that a parent would actually accept and continue to love a child that comes out to them? Fuck you, Channel. FUCK. YOU. I'm not even the biggest proponent for gay rights. I sympathise and support, but I don't go out of my way, and sometimes I find some of their methods questionable and kind of whiny. But it just aggravates me so much that the mainstream disdain for gay people, who are really just people, is so strong that one whole storyline can actually be censored, and when I read about it I don't even see the big fucking fuss. Oh wait, even better: Just clicked on the TWoP recap, and guess what was the first thing I read? "Previously, Andrew and Alex told Bree they were engaged." I DIDN'T SEE THIS IN THE PREVIOUSLY. I DIDN'T EVEN SEE THIS IN LAST WEEK'S EPISODE. Gosh, I'm SO mad. Someone at Channel 5 is going to get a really angry email from me. RIGHT NOW. * Just shot off my angry email. (Speaking of angry emails, I still haven't emailed Starhub about what Supersports did to my Roger match.)
They BETTER give me a decent reply, or I'd be even more pissed off. I might even send another angry email. Because, yeah, just don't mess with me when I'm fucking irritated.
before sunrise // before sunset
Previously:
|